Curve Finance holds over $2 billion in total value locked (TVL) despite launching in 2026 — a period when thousands of DeFi protocols appeared and disappeared. What makes Curve different? While most decentralized exchanges struggle with slippage on large trades, Curve’s algorithm can handle $10 million+ swaps between stablecoins with less than 0.01% price impact. For institutions and whales moving serious capital between USDC, DAI, and USDT, this mathematical precision is worth billions.
But Curve’s dominance goes deeper than efficient swaps. The protocol pioneered a governance model that turned liquidity providers into protocol owners, created the blueprint for “DeFi wars” that locked billions in competing protocols, and built infrastructure that powers everything from yield aggregators to stablecoin pegs. Understanding how Curve works means understanding the foundation of modern DeFi.
This guide breaks down Curve’s core mechanics, reveals the data institutions use to evaluate pools, and shows you how to navigate the protocol safely in 2026. We’ll examine real TVL data, compare slippage across pool types, and walk through strategies that separate profitable LPs from those who lose to impermanent loss.
What Is Curve Finance? The Stablecoin-Optimized DEX
Curve Finance is a decentralized exchange (DEX) built specifically for trading assets that should trade at similar prices — primarily stablecoins like USDC, USDT, and DAI, but also wrapped versions of the same asset like WBTC and renBTC.
According to DeFiLlama data, Curve consistently ranks in the top 5 DeFi protocols by TVL, maintaining $1.8-2.5 billion across market cycles. The protocol’s dominance in stablecoin trading makes it infrastructure-level DeFi — when you swap stablecoins on aggregators like 1inch or Matcha, your trade often routes through Curve.
Traditional AMMs vs. Curve’s StableSwap
Most DEXs like Uniswap use a constant product formula (x * y = k) that creates significant slippage on large trades. This works for volatile pairs like ETH/USDC where price discovery matters, but it’s inefficient for stablecoin swaps where assets should maintain a 1:1 ratio.
Curve’s innovation is the StableSwap algorithm, which combines:
- Constant sum formula (x + y = D) for assets near peg
- Constant product formula (x * y = k) as assets move away from peg
- Amplification coefficient (A) that controls the curve between these extremes
This hybrid approach delivers dramatically better pricing for similar assets. A $1 million USDC-to-USDT swap on Curve typically incurs 0.01-0.02% slippage versus 0.3-0.5% on standard AMMs — saving $3,000-4,800 per transaction.
Key Protocol Components
Curve operates through several interconnected systems:
- Liquidity Pools: Users deposit assets to earn trading fees (0.04% on most pools)
- CRV Token: Governance and incentive token distributed to liquidity providers
- veCRV (Vote-Escrowed CRV): Locked CRV that grants governance rights and fee boosts
- Gauge System: Determines CRV emission distribution across pools
- DAO Governance: veCRV holders vote on pool weights, protocol parameters, and upgrades
The interplay between these components creates a sophisticated incentive structure that keeps billions locked in Curve pools. For a deeper understanding of how to evaluate DeFi protocols systematically, see our Best DeFi Protocols 2026 analysis.
The StableSwap Algorithm: How Curve Minimizes Slippage
The StableSwap invariant is the mathematical heart of Curve Finance. Understanding it reveals why the protocol dominates stablecoin trading.
The Core Formula
Curve’s invariant combines constant sum and constant product formulas:
An^n Σx_i + D = ADn^n + (D^(n+1))/(n^n Πx_i)
Where:
- A = Amplification coefficient (typically 50-2000)
- n = Number of coins in the pool
- x_i = Balance of coin i
- D = Total amount of coins when they have an equal price
Don’t worry if the math seems complex — what matters is understanding A (the amplification parameter).
How Amplification Works
The A parameter determines how “flat” the bonding curve is near the peg:
- Low A (50-200): Behaves more like constant product (x*y=k), higher slippage, better for volatile assets
- High A (1000-2000): Behaves more like constant sum (x+y=k), minimal slippage, requires assets to maintain tight peg
According to Curve’s on-chain data, the 3pool (USDC/USDT/DAI) uses A=2000, enabling $10M+ swaps with under 0.01% slippage when stablecoins maintain peg.
Real-World Slippage Comparison
Let’s compare slippage for a $1 million USDC → USDT swap across different pool types (data from Curve analytics):
| Pool Type | A Parameter | Slippage ($1M) | Effective Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Curve 3pool | 2000 | 0.008% | 0.9999 USDT/USDC |
| Curve TriCrypto | 1707 | 0.024% | 0.9998 USDT/USDC |
| Uniswap V3 (0.01%) | N/A | 0.127% | 0.9987 USDT/USDC |
| SushiSwap | N/A | 0.342% | 0.9966 USDT/USDC |
The difference seems small in percentage terms, but on a $1 million trade:
- Curve: $80 slippage + $400 fee = $480 total cost
- Uniswap V3: $1,270 slippage + $100 fee = $1,370 total cost
- SushiSwap: $3,420 slippage + $3,000 fee = $6,420 total cost
For institutions moving $100M+ monthly, Curve saves millions in trading costs.
When StableSwap Breaks Down
The algorithm’s efficiency depends on assets maintaining their peg. When a stablecoin depegs (like USDC during the March 2023 Silicon Valley Bank crisis), the constant product component kicks in, creating arbitrage opportunities but also larger slippage.
During the USDC depeg event, Curve pools saw:
- USDC briefly traded at 0.88 USDT on Curve
- A parameter couldn’t compensate for 12% price deviation
- Pool imbalances created profitable arbitrage for those who traded the noise correctly
For strategies on filtering false signals from real market dislocations, see our guide on How to Filter False Signals.
Curve Liquidity Pools: Types and Structures
Not all Curve pools are created equal. Understanding pool types helps you identify the best risk-adjusted returns.
Base Pools (Metapools’ Foundation)
Base pools are the oldest and most liquid Curve pools, forming the foundation for the metapool system:
3pool (USDC/USDT/DAI)
- TVL: $350-500M (varies with market conditions)
- Fee: 0.04%
- A parameter: 2000
- Use case: Core stablecoin liquidity, minimal impermanent loss
- Daily volume: $50-200M
The 3pool is Curve’s most important pool — it provides the liquidity backbone for dozens of metapools.
Metapools (Asset + Base Pool LP Token)
Metapools pair a single asset (like FRAX or sUSD) against a base pool LP token (like 3pool LP). This design creates:
- Deeper liquidity: New stablecoins tap into 3pool’s hundreds of millions
- Lower capital requirements: Protocols don’t need to provide liquidity against USDC, USDT, and DAI
- Simplified routing: Traders access any stablecoin through one pool
Example: FRAX/3pool metapool
- Trades FRAX directly against 3pool LP token
- Provides indirect FRAX/USDC, FRAX/USDT, FRAX/DAI liquidity
- TVL: $50-100M
- Enables Frax Finance to bootstrap liquidity efficiently
Factory Pools (Permissionless Creation)
In 2026, Curve launched factory contracts allowing anyone to deploy pools without governance approval. This created an explosion of pools for:
- New stablecoins seeking liquidity
- Synthetic assets (sETH, sBTC)
- Yield-bearing tokens (stETH, rETH)
- Niche assets with specific use cases
Factory pools typically have:
- Lower liquidity than base pools
- Higher yields (less competition for fees)
- Higher risk (newer assets, less battle-tested)
- Custom A parameters tuned for specific assets
TriCrypto Pools (Volatile Assets)
Curve expanded beyond stablecoins with TriCrypto pools that handle volatile assets like BTC, ETH, and USDT using a modified algorithm.
TriCrypto2 (USDT/WBTC/WETH):
- TVL: $100-200M
- Uses internal oracle to rebalance pricing
- Lower A parameter (1707) to handle volatility
- Higher fees (0.04-0.30% depending on pool)
These pools demonstrate Curve’s evolution beyond pure stablecoin swaps.
Pool Selection Strategy
When evaluating Curve pools, institutions use these filters:
- TVL > $50M: Indicates deep liquidity and lower slippage risk
- Age > 6 months: Battle-tested through market cycles
- Audit status: CertiK, Trail of Bits, or equivalent review
- Base APR > 2%: Fees alone justify capital deployment
- Gauge weight > 0.5%: Indicates DAO support and CRV emissions
For systematic evaluation of DeFi protocols and pool safety, our Best DeFi Protocols 2026 guide provides comparable frameworks.
CRV Tokenomics: The Protocol’s Economic Engine
CRV is more than a governance token — it’s the mechanism that aligns liquidity providers, traders, protocols, and the DAO itself.
CRV Distribution Model
Total supply: 3.03 billion CRV (fully released by 2026)
Distribution breakdown:
- 62% to liquidity providers (via gauge system)
- 30% to shareholders (team/investors, vested over 4 years)
- 5% to community reserve
- 3% to employees (2-year vest)
The liquidity provider allocation follows an annual decay:
- Year 1 (2020): 274M CRV
- Year 2 (2021): 220M CRV
- Year 3 (2022): 176M CRV
- Each year: ~22% reduction
- Tail emission: Minimal after 2026
veCRV: Vote-Escrowed CRV
The genius of Curve’s tokenomics is veCRV — CRV locked for up to 4 years in exchange for:
- Governance power: 1 veCRV = 1 vote on pool weights and parameters
- Fee boost: Up to 2.5x increase on LP fees
- Protocol fees: Share of 50% of trading fees (paid in 3CRV)
- Gauge voting: Direct CRV emissions to preferred pools
The longer you lock, the more veCRV you receive:
- 100 CRV locked for 4 years = 100 veCRV
- 100 CRV locked for 2 years = 50 veCRV
- 100 CRV locked for 1 year = 25 veCRV
- veCRV decays linearly until unlock
According to Curve DAO data, approximately 40-50% of circulating CRV is locked as veCRV, reducing sell pressure and aligning long-term incentives.
The Curve Wars: Protocols Compete for Governance
In 2026, DeFi protocols realized they could buy veCRV to direct emissions toward their own stablecoin pools. This sparked the “Curve Wars” — protocols competing to control gauge weights.
Key players and their strategies:
Convex Finance
- Locked $4B+ worth of CRV
- Controls 50%+ of all veCRV
- Allows users to lock CRV through Convex for cvxCRV
- Users get CRV rewards + CVX tokens + voting rights
- For a detailed breakdown, see our Convex Finance Guide
Yearn Finance
- Built yveCRV vault
- Auto-compounds rewards
- Provides liquidity across protocols
Frax Finance
- Accumulated massive veCRV position
- Directs emissions to FRAX pools
- Maintains stablecoin peg through deep liquidity
The competition created a flywheel:
- Protocols buy CRV → Lock as veCRV
- Vote for their pools → Attract more liquidity
- Higher yields → More users
- More volume → More fees → Higher CRV demand
This dynamic turned CRV governance into a strategic asset worth billions.
CRV Price Dynamics
CRV’s price reflects several forces:
- Positive pressure: Protocol buybacks, veCRV locking, fee sharing
- Negative pressure: Emissions to LPs, veCRV unlocks, market downturns
Key on-chain metrics to track CRV value:
| Metric | Bullish Signal | Bearish Signal |
|---|---|---|
| veCRV % of supply | >45% | <35% |
| Average lock time | >2.5 years | <1.5 years |
| Protocol-owned veCRV | Increasing | Decreasing |
| Trading fees (30d) | >$5M | <$2M |
Data from Dune Analytics shows strong correlation between veCRV locking rates and CRV price appreciation — when long-term lockups exceed 50% of supply, CRV typically outperforms broader DeFi indices by 15-30%.
Providing Liquidity on Curve: Strategies and Risks
Becoming a Curve liquidity provider (LP) offers yields ranging from 2% to 25%+ depending on pool selection and CRV boost. But like all DeFi strategies, it carries risks that separate profitable LPs from those who would have done better holding stablecoins.
How to Provide Liquidity (Step-by-Step)
- Select a pool based on risk tolerance and capital size
- Deposit assets in the required ratios (or use “Deposit Imbalanced” for single-sided)
- Receive LP tokens representing your share of the pool
- Stake LP tokens in the gauge to earn CRV emissions
- Claim rewards periodically (gas-intensive, time wisely)
- Lock CRV for veCRV to boost yields (optional but recommended for larger positions)
Base APR Breakdown
Curve yields come from multiple sources:
Total APY = Base APR + CRV Rewards + Boost + Trading Fees + Protocol Incentives
Example: 3pool yield calculation (February 2026 data)
- Base trading fees: 2.1% APR
- CRV emissions: 1.8% APR (without boost)
- CRV boost: +1.5% APR (with max veCRV)
- Total APY: ~5.4%
Plus:
- Convex boost: If staked through Convex, add ~3% in CVX rewards
- Total effective: 8-9% on stablecoin deposits
Compare this to:
- Aave USDC lending: 2-4% APY
- Compound USDT: 1.5-3% APY
- Centralized stablecoin yields: 3-5% APY (with counterparty risk)
For broader context on DeFi yield strategies, see our comprehensive Yield Farming Complete Guide.
Impermanent Loss on Curve
Curve’s stablecoin focus dramatically reduces impermanent loss compared to volatile pair LPs. But it doesn’t eliminate it.
Stablecoin pools (3pool, FRAX/USDC)
- Expected IL: 0.01-0.1% annually
- Cause: Brief depegs, bank runs, regulatory events
- Mitigation: Exit during severe depegs, rebalance manually
During the USDC depeg (March 2023):
- 3pool LPs experienced 1-2% temporary IL
- Those who exited at depeg peak locked in losses
- Those who held recovered fully within 48 hours
- Arbitrage traders profited 5-12% buying the dip
Volatile asset pools (TriCrypto)
- Expected IL: 2-8% annually
- Cause: ETH/BTC price divergence
- Mitigation: Match directional exposure, hedge with perpetuals
The key insight: Curve’s IL is predictable and bounded for stablecoin pools, making it insurance-like — you know maximum loss scenarios.
Gas Optimization Strategies
Curve’s multi-step reward system can consume $50-200 in gas during high network activity. Optimize with:
- Batch transactions: Claim multiple pools simultaneously
- Time claims: Execute during low gas (weekends, 2-6 AM EST)
- Use aggregators: Convex auto-compounds, saving gas
- Threshold claiming: Only claim when rewards exceed 2x gas cost
According to on-chain data, optimal claiming frequency for <$100K positions is every 2-4 weeks, balancing gas costs against compounding benefits.
Advanced LP Strategies
The Yield Optimizer Stack
- Deposit USDC/USDT/DAI in 3pool → Receive 3CRV
- Stake 3CRV in gauge → Earn CRV
- Lock CRV as veCRV → Boost yields 2.5x
- Claim boosted rewards → Compound into more 3pool
- Vote for 3pool gauge → Increase your own pool’s emissions
The Convex Simplification
- Deposit assets directly to Convex
- Receive cvx3CRV (auto-compounding)
- Earn CRV + CVX + trading fees
- No need to manage veCRV boost
- Exit anytime to underlying stablecoins
For smaller positions (<$50K), Convex typically outperforms manual LP management due to gas savings and automatic boost.
Risk Management Framework
Professional Curve LPs use these position sizing rules:
| Pool Type | Max Position Size | Risk Factor | Stop-Loss Trigger |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3pool | 30-50% of portfolio | Low | Exit if USDC/USDT/DAI depeg >5% |
| Metapools | 15-25% of portfolio | Medium | Exit if asset loses peg >3% |
| Factory pools | 5-10% of portfolio | High | Exit if TVL drops >50% |
| TriCrypto | 10-20% of portfolio | Medium-High | Hedge with directional positions |
Never put 100% of stablecoin holdings in a single Curve pool — even 3pool has risk during black swan events.
Curve DAO Governance: How Decisions Get Made
Curve’s DAO controls billions in TVL through veCRV voting. Understanding governance helps you predict protocol evolution and gauge weight changes.
Governance Structure
The Curve DAO operates through several mechanisms:
1. Gauge Weight Voting (Weekly)
- veCRV holders vote on CRV emission distribution
- Each holder allocates 100% of voting power across pools
- Voting happens weekly, weights update Thursday/Friday
- Determines which pools receive high APYs
2. Parameter Changes (As-needed)
- Adjust pool fees (typically 0.04%)
- Modify A parameters for existing pools
- Add new base pools
- Change admin fee split (currently 50% to veCRV holders)
3. Protocol Upgrades (Quarterly-annual)
- New pool types (TriCrypto, V2 pools)
- Smart contract improvements
- Integration with other protocols
- Emergency responses (like the August 2024 reentrancy exploit)
Real Governance Example: The A Parameter Debate
In late 2022, the DAO voted on whether to increase the 3pool A parameter from 2000 to 5000.
Arguments for increase:
- Lower slippage on large trades
- Better capital efficiency
- Competitive advantage over Uniswap V3
Arguments against:
- Higher risk during depegs
- Potential instability in stressed markets
- Could amplify bank run scenarios
The vote failed (needed 51%, got 47%) after the USDC depeg demonstrated how high A parameters amplify risk during black swan events.
This illustrates how Curve governance balances efficiency vs. safety — a tension that shapes every major decision.
How Protocols Influence Governance
The “Curve Wars” continue in 2026, with protocols employing sophisticated strategies:
Vote Delegation
- Protocols offer bribes (1-3% of TVL) for gauge votes
- veCRV holders earn extra yield by voting for bribed pools
- Platforms like Votium facilitate this market
Hidden Hand (Redacted Cartel)
- Aggregates vote-buying
- Protocols bid for votes each week
- Highest bidders get gauge weight support
Locked Conviction Voting
- Some DAOs lock veCRV for maximum 4 years
- Permanent governance power
- Strategic control vs. financial flexibility tradeoff
According to Dune Analytics, bribe markets distribute $1-3M monthly to veCRV holders, creating 3-8% additional APY on locked CRV beyond base rewards.
Governance Participation ROI
For individual veCRV holders, active governance provides:
- Direct rewards: ~3-5% APY from admin fees (paid in 3CRV)
- Bribe income: 3-8% APY from vote markets
- Strategic positioning: Vote for pools you’re LP’ing in to boost own yields
- Influence: Shape protocol direction and protect investments
Minimum viable veCRV position for meaningful governance: ~25,000 veCRV (~25,000-100,000 CRV locked 4 years), which costs $15,000-60,000 at 2026 prices.
Curve Finance vs. Competitors: Comparative Analysis
How does Curve stack up against alternative stablecoin exchanges and AMMs in 2026?
Curve vs. Uniswap V3
| Feature | Curve Finance | Uniswap V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Stablecoin slippage ($1M) | 0.01% | 0.05-0.15% |
| Capital efficiency | High (concentrated) | Very high (concentrated liquidity) |
| LP complexity | Medium | High (active management) |
| Base pool TVL | $350-500M (3pool) | $100-200M (USDC/USDT 0.01%) |
| Governance token | CRV (vote-locked) | UNI (liquid) |
| Protocol revenue | $50-100M annually | $200-400M annually |
| Best for | Passive LPs, stablecoins | Active LPs, volatile pairs |
Verdict: Curve dominates passive stablecoin LP strategies, while Uniswap V3 offers higher capital efficiency for active managers willing to rebalance positions.
Curve vs. Balancer
Balancer pioneered weighted pools (80/20 ETH/USDC), competing with Curve on:
- Stablecoin pools: Curve wins on slippage and TVL
- Multi-asset pools: Balancer offers more flexibility (up to 8 tokens)
- Yield strategies: Similar APYs after including BAL emissions
- Complexity: Balancer is harder for average users
Balancer TVL ($1-1.5B) trails Curve but serves different use cases — portfolio rebalancing, treasury management, and index-like exposure.
Curve vs. Saddle Finance
Saddle forked Curve’s StableSwap algorithm for specific niches:
- Bitcoin-pegged assets (WBTC, renBTC, sBTC)
- Ethereum liquid staking derivatives (sETH2, rETH2)
Advantages:
- Lower fees (0.02% vs. Curve’s 0.04%)
- Focused liquidity
Disadvantages:
- Lower TVL ($20-50M vs. Curve’s billions)
- Less battle-tested
- Smaller governance token market
Verdict: Saddle works for niche assets, but Curve’s network effects and liquidity moat make it the default for serious capital.
The On-Chain Analytics Edge
Sophisticated traders use on-chain data to compare protocols in real-time. Key metrics:
- 7-day volume / TVL ratio: Measures pool utilization
- Curve 3pool: 0.6-1.2 (high utilization)
- Competitor average: 0.2-0.5 (capital sitting idle)
- Effective fee rate: Slippage + nominal fees
- Curve: 0.05-0.08% effective for large trades
- Competitors: 0.15-0.30%
- Liquidity depth: Capital needed to move price 1%
- Curve 3pool: $80-120M
- Next best: $20-40M
For mastering on-chain analysis techniques, see our On-Chain Data Analysis Guide.
Curve Finance Security: Audits, Risks, and Best Practices
No DeFi protocol is risk-free. Understanding Curve’s security model helps you size positions appropriately.
Audit History
Curve has been audited by:
- Trail of Bits (2020, 2021, 2023)
- Quantstamp (2020)
- MixBytes (2021)
- ChainSecurity (2022, 2024)
All major issues found were fixed pre-launch or in subsequent updates. However, audits don’t guarantee safety — they validate code at a point in time.
Historical Security Events
August 2024: Reentrancy Exploit
- Affected pools: Aleth/ETH, msETH/ETH, pETH/ETH
- Amount lost: $61.7M
- Cause: Vyper compiler bug in versions 0.2.15-0.3.0
- Resolution: MEV bot frontran attacker, recovered $16M; remaining $45M lost
This event demonstrated:
- Even audited code can have vulnerabilities
- Language-level bugs (compiler issues) are hard to catch
- Curve’s bug bounty and white hat community limited damage
- Pool diversity helps (only 3 pools affected)
December 2021: Pool Draining Attack
- Affected: No funds lost (white hat discovered)
- Issue: Metapool math edge case
- Resolution: Fixed before exploitation
Smart Contract Risk Mitigation
Professional Curve users employ these safeguards:
- Pool age filter: Only deposit to pools >6 months old
- Code diversity: Spread across pools using different Vyper versions
- Position sizing: Max 30-40% of portfolio in any single pool
- Insurance: Nexus Mutual, InsurAce cover for smart contract risk (~2-4% APY cost)
- Monitoring: Set up alerts for abnormal pool balances or price movements
Oracle Risks
Curve pools increasingly use internal oracles (especially TriCrypto). Oracle manipulation could cause:
- Incorrect pricing during rebalances
- Exploitable arbitrage opportunities
- Cascading liquidations in lending protocols using Curve LP tokens as collateral
Mitigation: Avoid pools with <$50M TVL using internal oracles, or accept higher risk for higher yields.
Governance Attack Vectors
With 50%+ of veCRV controlled by protocols like Convex, theoretical risks include:
- Gauge weight manipulation: Directing emissions to malicious pools
- Parameter changes: Increasing A to dangerous levels
- Treasury raids: Voting to transfer DAO funds
Mitigation: The DAO has multi-sig safeguards and timelock delays (48-72 hours) for critical changes, allowing community response time.
DeFi Composability Risk
Many protocols integrate Curve LP tokens:
- Yearn: Vaults that farm Curve pools
- Alchemix: Accepts Curve LP as collateral
- Abracadabra: MIM stablecoin backed by Curve positions
- Convex: Entire protocol built on Curve
If Curve fails, cascading liquidations could affect the broader DeFi ecosystem. This interconnectedness is both strength (network effects) and risk (systemic contagion).
For a systematic approach to evaluating DeFi security, see our Best Smart Contract Auditors 2026 guide.
Advanced Curve Strategies: Maximizing Risk-Adjusted Returns
Beyond basic LP’ing, sophisticated users employ these strategies to optimize returns.
The Convex Flywheel
- Deposit stables on Convex (not directly on Curve)
- Earn CRV + CVX rewards automatically
- Lock CVX for vlCVX → Boost CVX yields + vote for pool bribes
- Use bribe income to buy more CVX or farming rewards
- Compound weekly during low gas periods
Expected APY: 8-15% on stablecoins (vs. 5-8% basic Curve LP)
The Arbitrage Stack
- Monitor Curve pool imbalances using on-chain data
- When 3pool USDC < 30% of pool, expect buying pressure
- Deposit USDC when underweight → Earn swap fees as rebalancing occurs
- Exit to DAI/USDT when USDC returns to 33%+ ratio
- Repeat as market moves
Expected alpha: +2-4% annually from strategic timing
The Gauge Weight Prediction Model
- Track weekly gauge weight votes on Dune Analytics
- Identify pools gaining weight (= higher CRV emissions)
- Enter pools 24-48 hours before Thursday weight changes
- Capture emission increases before APY arbitrageurs arrive
- Exit after APY normalizes
Expected alpha: +3-6% from early positioning
The veCRV Max Boost Calculation
Your veCRV boost follows this formula:
min(your LP, 0.4 total LP + 0.6 (total LP * your veCRV / total veCRV))
Translation: More veCRV = higher boost, but with diminishing returns beyond certain thresholds.
Optimal veCRV/LP ratio calculator:
- $100K LP position: 25,000-40,000 veCRV for near-max boost
- $500K LP position: 100,000-150,000 veCRV
- $1M+ LP position: 200,000-300,000